You’ve been asking for ways to get the kids involved in your quest for green, and we’re happy to provide some suggestions. A great way to start - if they haven’t seen the Earth Rangers, check them out at www.earthrangers.org and invite your school to book their free show.

Earth Rangers is an environmental education organization based in the Greater Toronto Area. They go into schools and offer a live show with a strong environmental message in a fun way, along with some amazing wildlife that the students can see in action. There are separate shows for primary, junior and intermediate students that inspire them to take action to protect the planet.

Their kids’ website, www.earthrangers.com provides a follow up to the school show. I has a bunch of great eco-tips for kids, along with fun games to play (my daughter likes Funky Skunky best – and I have to say that I see where she’s coming from). The games also have a great message woven into them, like recycling, composting, or energy efficiency.

(more…)

Perhaps one of the most difficult issues that we’ve tackled as Green Cricket is the search for Green Cosmetics. Ideally, we’d love to recommend a line of cosmetics that reduces both the environmental impacts and the health risks of traditional cosmetics, yet function just as well.

Sadly, that is not as easy as we had hoped. The challenge is that there is not a great deal of consensus around what is acceptable or isn’t in these products. While we always want to err on the side of caution, some of the truly green ones that we’ve found really aren’t a great substitute for more conventional cosmetics.

Some highlights of the debate:

1) Parabens – A widely used preservative to inhibit microbial growth in personal care products, in particular cosmetics. It’s good, because it does a good job of keeping cosmetics safe, extends their shelf life, and it replaced formaldehyde. The challenge is that while both Health Canada, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States currently say that it’s safe, there is mounting concern over its long-term safety too. Most major cosmetic companies are looking for alternatives to phase it out. But there is no easy switch, so companies like Jamieson, Avon and Almay, are experimenting with new options.

2) Nanoparticles – Microscopic particles being added to all kinds of personal care products – usually because of their UV blocking capabilities. The problem is that they haven’t been tested for safety either on people or the environment, and early reviews aren’t optimistic. Again, we’re hoping to avoid it.

3) Propylene Glycol – Used to moisturize both the skin, and to prevent cosmetics from drying out themselves. Again, Health Canada and the FDA have given it the green light, but the debate outside these forums rages on about short-term skin irritation, and long-term safety. A deciding factor for me – if it’s a major component of automotive antifreeze, I probably want to minimize in the products that I put on my face.

So where can we get good information? Well that’s another part of the challenge. (more…)

I am wrapping up my fourth year living in one of the largest, most populated cities in the world. The New York metropolitan area has an estimated population of 19.75 million people, ranking it the largest city in the US, and fourth largest in the world. That’s about 5 times the population of Metro Toronto, and much more geographically constrained. It is estimated that over 80% of people who live in Manhattan bike, walk or take public transportation to work.

Living in such density makes a commitment to a green lifestyle challenging in many ways, and easy in others.

The easiest part of living green in Gotham is that I don’t need a car because the public transportation is excellent – an instant contribution to reducing my carbon footprint. The Metro Transportation Authority (commuter rail, NYC subways and buses) carries 1/3 of all the commuters in the US each day. This is an astonishing statistic. This means a lot of cars left at (or near) home. I like the MTA (note the absence of “love”), but I have a bone to pick with them about their recycling policy. While they sort recyclables from the trash bins in subway and train stations, there is no sign on the receptacles to tell consumers this fact and thereby create public awareness.

Toronto’s organic waste composting program has not reached our shores. There is no wet waste pickup in Gotham. Worse still is that most of us live in tiny shoebox-sized apartments with no yard to start composting. And rodents and cockroaches (called water bugs in New York) are a serious problem, leaving composting under the kitchen counter a magnet for unwanted visitors. But, those of us committed to composting of organic waste schlep our stinky bits to one of two places in the city as part of the Lower East Side Ecology Center community composting program. They also have occasional drop-off events for recycling of electronics and clothing.

In a city the size of New York, private interests like LESEC fill in where public interests can’t or won’t. For example, #5 plastic containers are not recyclable in New York. Neither are batteries (although, get this, it is illegal to dispose of them in the garbage). Whole Foods will take #5’s and batteries to be recycled.

While the city still has a way to go, Mayor Bloomberg is taking a leadership role in the greening of New York. Part of his plan was to pass a congestion tax, similar to those imposed in London, Stockholm and Singapore, but the boneheads in Albany said no. Instead, Bloomberg decided to increase bridge and tunnel tolls, convert major intersections like the Broadway-Fifth Avenue crossover at 23^rd Street, to parks. A major part of Broadway in Midtown was converted to bike lanes and a promenade. And bike lanes all over the city displaced car traffic lanes. In some cases, boulevards planted with gardens separate the cyclist from the parked cars and traffic. Indeed, these initiatives have frustrated car drivers’ ability to get around the city, making them think twice about using the car at all.

I will be writing more over the coming weeks on the subject of green metropolises, and share with you the thrills of what I have learned about living a green life in a major urban centre. I am in the midst of relocating to the San Francisco area and will begin to report on my findings in relation to what I learned in New York.

[written by David Greene]

In his bestselling book on climate change, Hot Flat and Crowded, Tom Friedman includes a chapter on what he refers to as “global weirding”. What he is referring to with this phrase is “increased variability” in the climate, as opposed to a uniform, linear increase in temperature that many have come to expect as the earth’s average daily temperature increases.

This is because the laws of nature do not behave in ways that are wholly predictable. Have you heard of the butterfly effect? Or chaos theory? Or the idea of logarithmic feedback loops?  There are so many factors interacting with each other to create the experience of a snowstorm, or a drought, or a flood, or a hurricane, that it becomes increasingly difficult to predict exactly how or when climate change will show up in our day or our year or even in this century. What we do know is that we should expect the unexpected.

That means that a typical fall may be followed by daffodils in January, followed by a typical spring and a summer that is much colder than usual, and then the complete absence of fall and then a winter with record low temperatures and blizzards. In other words, all sort of extremes with a lack of predictability built-in.

This is why our weather reporters have been so rarely on the mark this last year or two. The carefully built predictive meteorology models that scientists have traditionally used to tell us what to expect the next day or next week are falling apart in the face of this “increased variability”.

I’m a sailor, and I can tell you that the difficulty in predicting the future weather had big implications for me when I took our family sailboat out this last August for a month-long trip along the north shore of Lake Ontario. A lighting storm that hit the lake on August 9 was not predicted, inspiring an article in the Toronto Star about “meteorologist-bashing” that pointed out that the public was getting increasingly irate with inexact predictions. For my part, I was stranded on my boat that night outside a harbour with a badly marked channel. Had I known about the lightning storm I would not have been on the lake. On the other hand, if I were to not set out at all every time the forecast said there was a “chance of thundershowers”, I would not have set out on my boat at all.

When our friends and neighbors who are skeptical about global warming, pointing out that the current summer has never been colder or that the current winter has never been as severe,  you can lean towards them and say “climate change means increased variability” with a knowing look.

What does all this mean for us in our daily lives? It means that we should stay flexible and low-to-the-ground when it comes to planning our gardens, our outdoor activities, our wardrobes, our home renovations.  Be ready for anything, expect the unexpected, and then you can enjoy the beauty an intense lightning stormin the summer or a long hike on a mild winter Saturday.

A lightning bolt strikes over Highway 404 South as a major thunderstorm rolls through the GTA Aug. 9, 2009, as seen from the Finch Ave. overpass. ADRIEN VECZAN/TORONTO STAR